DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Chrysler 300 vs 2015 Mazda CX-9 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chrysler 300

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

78.75–78.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChryslerMakeMazda
300ModelCX-9
2012Model year2015
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats7
4Doors5

Performance

7,0 s0–100 km/h—
240 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3604 ccEngine displacement3726 cc
292 HPPower273 HP
350 NmTorque270 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
72 ltFuel tank76 lt
14,3 ltUrban consumption13,8 lt
7,1 ltExtra-urban consumption9,8 lt
9,7 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
8Gears6
215/65 R17Tyre size245/60 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5066 mmLength5232 mm
1902 mmWidth1935 mm
1462 mmHeight1727 mm
1828 KgWeight1958 Kg
3052 mmWheelbase2875 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Chrysler 300 and 2015 Mazda CX-9 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chrysler 300 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…