DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Chrysler 300 vs 2012 SsangYong Chairman Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

SsangYong Chairman

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

78.75–79.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChryslerMakeSsangYong
300ModelChairman
2012Model year2012
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

7,0 s0–100 km/h—
240 km/hTop speed210 km/h
3604 ccEngine displacement3199 cc
286 HPPower220 HP
340 NmTorque305 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
72 ltFuel tank80 lt
14,3 ltUrban consumption17,1 lt
7,1 ltExtra-urban consumption10,8 lt
9,7 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
8Gears4
245/45 R20Tyre size215/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5066 mmLength5355 mm
1902 mmWidth1825 mm
1462 mmHeight1475 mm
1828 KgWeight1750 Kg
3052 mmWheelbase3200 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Chrysler 300 and 2012 SsangYong Chairman approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, SsangYong Chairman leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…