DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Alfa Romeo 4C vs 2017 Jaguar XF Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jaguar XF

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

85.5–85.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Alfa RomeoMakeJaguar
4CModelXF
2017Model year2017
CabrioletBody typeSedan
2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

4,5 s0–100 km/h6,6 s
257 km/hTop speed244 km/h
1742 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
240 HPPower250 HP
350 NmTorque365 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
40 ltFuel tank74 lt
10,1 ltUrban consumption—
5,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,9 ltAverage consumption6,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6 TCTGears8
205/45 R17; 235/40 R18Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3989 mmLength4954 mm
1864 mmWidth—
1183 mmHeight1457 mm
940 KgWeight1635 Kg
2380 mmWheelbase2960 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Alfa Romeo 4C and 2017 Jaguar XF approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jaguar XF leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…