DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Alfa Romeo 4C vs 2017 Jaguar F-Pace Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jaguar F-Pace

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

85.5–85.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Alfa RomeoMakeJaguar
4CModelF-Pace
2017Model year2017
CabrioletBody typeSUV
2Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

4,5 s0–100 km/h6,8 s
257 km/hTop speed217 km/h
1742 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
240 HPPower250 HP
350 NmTorque365 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
40 ltFuel tank63 lt
10,1 ltUrban consumption—
5,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,9 ltAverage consumption7,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6 TCTGears8
205/45 R17; 235/40 R18Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3989 mmLength4746 mm
1864 mmWidth2070 mm
1183 mmHeight1667 mm
940 KgWeight1710 Kg
2380 mmWheelbase2874 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Alfa Romeo 4C and 2017 Jaguar F-Pace approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jaguar F-Pace leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…