DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Chrysler 300 vs 2011 Toyota Highlander Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Highlander

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.5–66.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChryslerMakeToyota
300ModelHighlander
2010Model year2011
EstateBody typeSUV
5Seats7
5Doors5

Performance

11,1 s0–100 km/h9,8 s
209 km/hTop speed175 km/h
2736 ccEngine displacement2672 cc
193 HPPower189 HP
258 NmTorque252 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank72 lt
16,1 ltUrban consumption13,1 lt
8,4 ltExtra-urban consumption8,7 lt
11,2 ltAverage consumption9,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears4
225/60 R18Tyre size225/70 R16
YesABS—

Dimensions

4999 mmLength4785 mm
1881 mmWidth1910 mm
1481 mmHeight1760 mm
1725 KgWeight1620 Kg
3048 mmWheelbase2790 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Chrysler 300 and 2011 Toyota Highlander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Highlander leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…