DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Chrysler 300 vs 2004 Chrysler Concorde Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chrysler Concorde

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.5–66.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChryslerMakeChrysler
300ModelConcorde
2005Model year2004
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

11,1 s0–100 km/h8,8 s
209 km/hTop speed187 km/h
2736 ccEngine displacement2736 cc
193 HPPower203 HP
258 NmTorque258 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank65 lt
16,1 ltUrban consumption11,8 lt
8,4 ltExtra-urban consumption8,4 lt
11,2 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears4
225/60 R18Tyre size225/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4999 mmLength5310 mm
1881 mmWidth1900 mm
1481 mmHeight1420 mm
1725 KgWeight1570 Kg
3048 mmWheelbase2870 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Chrysler 300 and 2004 Chrysler Concorde approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chrysler Concorde leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…