DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Chrysler 200 vs 2016 Volvo V60 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chrysler 200

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

70.5–69.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChryslerMakeVolvo
200ModelV60
2016Model year2016
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,4 s
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2360 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
184 HPPower163 HP
234 NmTorque400 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank67 lt
10,2 ltUrban consumption6,1 lt
6,5 ltExtra-urban consumption4,3 lt
8,4 ltAverage consumption4,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
9Gears6
215/55 R17Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4884 mmLength4635 mm
1871 mmWidth1825 mm
1491 mmHeight1484 mm
1575 KgWeight1731 Kg
2742 mmWheelbase2776 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Chrysler 200 and 2016 Volvo V60 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chrysler 200 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…