DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Chrysler 200 vs 2013 Volvo S60 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chrysler 200

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChryslerMakeVolvo
200ModelS60
2013Model year2013
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,2 s
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2360 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
175 HPPower163 HP
225 NmTorque400 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
64 ltFuel tank67 lt
11,2 ltUrban consumption—
7,8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,8 ltAverage consumption5,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4/6Gears6
225/55 R17; 225/50 R18Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4870 mmLength4628 mm
1843 mmWidth1865 mm
1482 mmHeight1484 mm
1543 KgWeight1582 Kg
2765 mmWheelbase2776 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Chrysler 200 and 2013 Volvo S60 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chrysler 200 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…