2012 • Chrysler
200
Chrysler 200 2.4 (175 Hp) 2012Overall Score68.5/100
2012 Chrysler 200 vs 2012 Volvo C30 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2012 • Volvo
C30
Volvo C30 2.0 D4 (177 Hp) 2012Overall Score67.75/100
WINNER
Chrysler 200
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Chrysler 200SpecificationVolvo C30
ChryslerMakeVolvo
200ModelC30
2012Model year2012
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats5
4Doors3
Performance
Chrysler 200SpecificationVolvo C30
—0–100 km/h8,6 s
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2360 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
175 HPPower177 HP
225 NmTorque400 Nm
4Cylinders5
Fuel & Consumption
Chrysler 200SpecificationVolvo C30
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
64 ltFuel tank60 lt
11,2 ltUrban consumption7,0 lt
7,8 ltExtra-urban consumption4,0 lt
9,8 ltAverage consumption5,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Chrysler 200SpecificationVolvo C30
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4/6Gears6
225/55 R17; 225/50 R18Tyre size—
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Chrysler 200SpecificationVolvo C30
4870 mmLength4266 mm
1843 mmWidth1782 mm
1482 mmHeight1447 mm
1543 KgWeight1451 Kg
2765 mmWheelbase2640 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2012 Chrysler 200 and 2012 Volvo C30 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Chrysler 200 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…