DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Chevrolet Trax vs 2016 Citroen C3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Trax

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

59.25–58.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeCitroen
TraxModelC3
2016Model year2016
SUVBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

12,3 s0–100 km/h10,8 s
174 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1560 cc
115 HPPower99 HP
155 NmTorque254 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
53 ltFuel tank48 lt
8,4 ltUrban consumption3,6 lt
5,4 ltExtra-urban consumption2,9 lt
6,5 ltAverage consumption3,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size195/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4248 mmLength3941 mm
1776 mmWidth1728 mm
1674 mmHeight1538 mm
1287 KgWeight1085 Kg
2555 mmWheelbase2466 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Chevrolet Trax and 2016 Citroen C3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Trax leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…