DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Chevrolet Trax vs 2013 Audi A3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi A3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

70.25–70.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeAudi
TraxModelA3
2013Model year2013
SUVBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

9,5 s0–100 km/h8,3 s
196 km/hTop speed212 km/h
1364 ccEngine displacement1395 cc
140 HPPower140 HP
200 NmTorque250 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
53 ltFuel tank50 lt
8,2 ltUrban consumption5,8 lt
5,2 ltExtra-urban consumption4,1 lt
6,7 ltAverage consumption4,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x2DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
ManualTransmission—
16Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4248 mmLength4237 mm
1776 mmWidth1777 mm
1647 mmHeight1421 mm
1319 kgWeight1195 Kg
356 ltLuggage capacity—
—Wheelbase2601 mm

Additional Features

Chevrolet TraxDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagABSEBDESPASRHill Start AssistCruise ControlTyre Pressure Monitoringstart-stopPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsManual Air ConditioningIlluminated Vanity MirrorRear Fog LightsAlloy Wheels
Audi A3

No additional feature records are available.

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Chevrolet Trax and 2013 Audi A3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi A3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…