DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2011 Chevrolet Traverse vs 2015 Mazda CX-9 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Traverse

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

78.75–78.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeMazda
TraverseModelCX-9
2011Model year2015
SUV, CrossoverBody typeSUV
7/8Seats7
5Doors5

Performance

0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3564 ccEngine displacement3726 cc
281 HPPower273 HP
361 NmTorque270 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
83 ltFuel tank76 lt
13,8 ltUrban consumption13,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9,8 lt
9,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6 Hydra-Matic 6T75Gears6
245/70 R17; 255/65 R18; 255/55 R20Tyre size245/60 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5206 mmLength5232 mm
—Width1935 mm
1846 mmHeight1727 mm
2141 KgWeight1958 Kg
3019 mmWheelbase2875 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2011 Chevrolet Traverse and 2015 Mazda CX-9 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Traverse leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…