DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Chevrolet Trailblazer vs 2004 Ford Explorer Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Trailblazer

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

79.5–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeFord
TrailblazerModelExplorer
2009Model year2004
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

8,7 s0–100 km/h—
163 km/hTop speed0 km/h
5327 ccEngine displacement5408 cc
304 HPPower303 HP
447 NmTorque495 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
94 ltFuel tank85 lt
14,7 ltUrban consumption—
12,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears6
245/65 R17Tyre size235/70 R16
YesABS—

Dimensions

5279 mmLength4813 mm
1895 mmWidth1832 mm
1957 mmHeight1814 mm
2245 KgWeight1995 Kg
3277 mmWheelbase2890 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Chevrolet Trailblazer and 2004 Ford Explorer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Trailblazer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…