DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Chevrolet Trailblazer vs 2004 Ford Explorer Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Explorer

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

73.5–74.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeFord
TrailblazerModelExplorer
2004Model year2004
Off-road vehicleBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

9,0 s0–100 km/h—
192 km/hTop speed185 km/h
4157 ccEngine displacement4601 cc
279 HPPower242 HP
373 NmTorque380 Nm
6Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
71 ltFuel tank85 lt
14,7 ltUrban consumption16,8 lt
10,7 ltExtra-urban consumption12,4 lt
13 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears5
245/70 R16 STyre size235/70 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4872 mmLength4810 mm
1895 mmWidth1830 mm
1892 mmHeight1830 mm
2015 KgWeight1965 Kg
2870 mmWheelbase2890 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Chevrolet Trailblazer and 2004 Ford Explorer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Explorer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…