DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2007 Acura EL vs 2017 Alpina B3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alpina B3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 36.25 points.

57.25–93.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Acura ELSpecificationAlpina B3
AcuraMakeAlpina
ELModelB3
2007Model year2017
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Acura ELSpecificationAlpina B3
9,4 s0–100 km/h4,0 s
175 km/hTop speed301 km/h
1590 ccEngine displacement2979 cc
107 HPPower440 HP
139 NmTorque660 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Acura ELSpecificationAlpina B3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank60 lt
7,1 ltUrban consumption11,5 lt
6,2 ltExtra-urban consumption6,5 lt
—Average consumption8,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Acura ELSpecificationAlpina B3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears8 Switch-Tronic
175/70 R13Tyre size245/30 ZR20; 265/30 ZR20
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Acura ELSpecificationAlpina B3
4480 mmLength4632 mm
1705 mmWidth1811 mm
1395 mmHeight1431 mm
1145 KgWeight1705 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase2810 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2007 Acura EL and 2017 Alpina B3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alpina B3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 36.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…