DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2001 Chevrolet Tracker vs 2001 Toyota Cresta Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Tracker

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

69.25–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeToyota
TrackerModelCresta
2001Model year2001
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

160 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2494 ccEngine displacement2496 cc
167 HPPower200 HP
220 NmTorque245 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
66 ltFuel tank70 lt
12,4 ltUrban consumption11,6 lt
11,2 ltExtra-urban consumption6,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears—
215/70 R15Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4059 mmLength4750 mm
1694 mmWidth1755 mm
1689 mmHeight1420 mm
1335 KgWeight—
2479 mmWheelbase2730 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2001 Chevrolet Tracker and 2001 Toyota Cresta approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Tracker leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…