DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Chevrolet Tracker vs 2000 Land Rover Freelander Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Tracker

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

63.25–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeLand Rover
TrackerModelFreelander
2000Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
3Doors3

Performance

—0–100 km/h14,4 s
150 km/hTop speed159 km/h
1995 ccEngine displacement1950 cc
122 HPPower112 HP
182 NmTorque260 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
56 ltFuel tank60 lt
10,2 ltUrban consumption9,1 lt
9,4 ltExtra-urban consumption6,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
195/75 R15Tyre size195/80 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3780 mmLength4368 mm
1694 mmWidth1809 mm
1689 mmHeight1708 mm
1210 KgWeight1565 Kg
2200 mmWheelbase2557 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Chevrolet Tracker and 2000 Land Rover Freelander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Tracker leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…