DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Chevrolet Tracker vs 2004 Opel Astra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Astra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

56.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeOpel
TrackerModelAstra
2004Model year2004
Off-road vehicleBody typeCoupe
5Seats2+2
3Doors2

Performance

150 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1590 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
97 HPPower103 HP
133 NmTorque147 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
42 ltFuel tank52 lt
—Urban consumption8,8 lt
8,7 ltExtra-urban consumption5,5 lt
—Average consumption6,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195//75 R15Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3650 mmLength4267 mm
1630 mmWidth1709 mm
1650 mmHeight1390 mm
1060 KgWeight1165 Kg
2200 mmWheelbase2606 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Chevrolet Tracker and 2004 Opel Astra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Astra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…