DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1991 Alfa Romeo 33 vs 1991 Renault Clio Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Clio

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

55.5–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Alfa RomeoMakeRenault
33ModelClio
1991Model year1991
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3/5

Performance

—0–100 km/h8,9 s
0 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1712 ccEngine displacement1794 cc
129 HPPower110 HP
0 NmTorque158 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank43 lt
—Urban consumption10,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,2 lt
—Average consumption7,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size175/60 R14
—ABSYes

Dimensions

—Length3709 mm
—Width1616 mm
—Height1395 mm
—Weight955 Kg
—Wheelbase2472 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1991 Alfa Romeo 33 and 1991 Renault Clio approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Clio leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…