DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Chevrolet Rezzo vs 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Rezzo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

54.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeMitsubishi
RezzoModelLancer
2006Model year2006
MinivanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

12,2 s0–100 km/h12,6 s
167 km/hTop speed181 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1584 cc
105 HPPower98 HP
142 NmTorque150 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank50 lt
11 ltUrban consumption8,9 lt
6,7 ltExtra-urban consumption5,8 lt
8,3 ltAverage consumption7,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/70 R14Tyre size195/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4350 mmLength4485 mm
1755 mmWidth1695 mm
1580 mmHeight1480 mm
1272 KgWeight1360 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase2600 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Chevrolet Rezzo and 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Rezzo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…