DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Chevrolet Orlando vs 2017 Chevrolet Trax Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Trax

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeChevrolet
OrlandoModelTrax
2017Model year2017
MPVBody typeSUV
7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

11,0 s0–100 km/h9,8 s
200 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1362 ccEngine displacement1364 cc
140 HPPower140 HP
200 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank53 lt
8,1 ltUrban consumption8,0 lt
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption5,5 lt
6,4 ltAverage consumption6,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4652 mmLength4248 mm
1836 mmWidth1776 mm
1633 mmHeight1674 mm
1539 KgWeight1380 Kg
2760 mmWheelbase2555 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Chevrolet Orlando and 2017 Chevrolet Trax approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Trax leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…