DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2001 Chevrolet Omega vs 2001 Ford Explorer Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Explorer

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

70.75–71.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeFord
OmegaModelExplorer
2001Model year2001
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors3

Performance

10,0 s0–100 km/h—
216 km/hTop speed177 km/h
3791 ccEngine displacement3958 cc
200 HPPower160 HP
304 NmTorque305 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank66 lt
13,5 ltUrban consumption—
8,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
215/60 R16Tyre size255/70 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4880 mmLength4536 mm
1825 mmWidth1783 mm
1440 mmHeight1714 mm
1640 KgWeight1807 Kg
2790 mmWheelbase2593 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2001 Chevrolet Omega and 2001 Ford Explorer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Explorer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…