DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Chevrolet Omega vs 1996 Audi Cabriolet Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Omega

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

58.5–58.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeAudi
OmegaModelCabriolet
1996Model year1996
SedanBody typeCabriolet
5Seats4
4Doors2

Performance

—0–100 km/h12,9 s
0 km/hTop speed187 km/h
2198 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
116 HPPower115 HP
197 NmTorque165 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank70 lt
—Urban consumption12,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,8 lt
—Average consumption9,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15 VTyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4738 mmLength4366 mm
1760 mmWidth1716 mm
1418 mmHeight1379 mm
1350 KgWeight1350 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2556 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Chevrolet Omega and 1996 Audi Cabriolet approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Omega leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…