DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2001 Acura EL vs 2001 MG ZS Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Acura EL

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

54.25–53.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Acura ELSpecificationMG ZS
AcuraMakeMG
ELModelZS
2001Model year2001
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Acura ELSpecificationMG ZS
9,4 s0–100 km/h9,0 s
175 km/hTop speed19 km/h
1590 ccEngine displacement1795 cc
107 HPPower117 HP
139 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Acura ELSpecificationMG ZS
PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank55 lt
7,1 ltUrban consumption9,7 lt
6,2 ltExtra-urban consumption5,8 lt
—Average consumption7,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Acura ELSpecificationMG ZS
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/70 R13Tyre size205/45 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Acura ELSpecificationMG ZS
4480 mmLength4520 mm
1705 mmWidth1700 mm
1395 mmHeight1390 mm
1145 KgWeight1125 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase2620 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2001 Acura EL and 2001 MG ZS approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Acura EL leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…