DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Chevrolet Metro vs 2005 Opel Agila Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Agila

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

52.5–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeOpel
MetroModelAgila
2004Model year2005
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats4
3Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h15,0 s
145 km/hTop speed153 km/h
993 ccEngine displacement1248 cc
56 HPPower70 HP
78 NmTorque170 Nm
3Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
39 ltFuel tank41 lt
5,7 ltUrban consumption6,6 lt
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption4,4 lt
—Average consumption5,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
155/80 R13Tyre size165/60 R14
YesABS—

Dimensions

3790 mmLength3500 mm
1590 mmWidth1620 mm
1390 mmHeight1700 mm
860 KgWeight1055 Kg
2360 mmWheelbase2360 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Chevrolet Metro and 2005 Opel Agila approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Agila leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…