DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2014 Chevrolet Malibu vs 2016 Volvo S90 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Malibu

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

78.75–77.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeVolvo
MalibuModelS90
2014Model year2016
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h5,8 s
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1969 cc
259 HPPower320 HP
353 NmTorque400 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank60 lt
11,2 ltUrban consumption—
7,8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption7,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
215/60 R16; 225/55 R17; 235/50 R18; 245/45 R19Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4865 mmLength4963 mm
1854 mmWidth1879 mm
1462 mmHeight1443 mm
1649 KgWeight—
2738 mmWheelbase2941 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2014 Chevrolet Malibu and 2016 Volvo S90 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Malibu leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…