DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Chevrolet Malibu vs 2016 KTM X-Bow Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

KTM X-Bow

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

80.75–81.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeKTM
MalibuModelX-Bow
2017Model year2016
SedanBody typeRoadster
5Seats2
4Doors—

Performance

—0–100 km/h3,9 s
0 km/hTop speed220 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
250 HPPower240 HP
353 NmTorque310 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank40 lt
10,7 ltUrban consumption—
7,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption7,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
9 Hydra-MaticGears6
205/60 R16; 225/55 R17; 245/45 R18; 245/40 R19Tyre size205/40 R17; 235/40 R18
YesABS—

Dimensions

4923 mmLength3738 mm
1854 mmWidth1915 mm
1463 mmHeight1202 mm
1429 KgWeight790 Kg
2830 mmWheelbase2430 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Chevrolet Malibu and 2016 KTM X-Bow approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, KTM X-Bow leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…