DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Chevrolet Malibu vs 2016 Volvo V40 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo V40

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeVolvo
MalibuModelV40
2016Model year2016
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,8 s
0 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1800 ccEngine displacement1969 cc
122 HPPower122 HP
175 NmTorque220 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Hybrid – Petrol / ElectricFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank62 lt
4,9 ltUrban consumption—
5,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption5,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

—DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears6
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4923 mmLength4369 mm
1854 mmWidth1857 mm
1463 mmHeight1439 mm
1526 KgWeight—
2830 mmWheelbase2647 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Chevrolet Malibu and 2016 Volvo V40 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo V40 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…