DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Chevrolet Lumina vs 1996 Oldsmobile Cutlass Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Oldsmobile Cutlass

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.5–68.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeOldsmobile
LuminaModelCutlass
1996Model year1996
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

0 km/hTop speed190 km/h
3352 ccEngine displacement3340 cc
213 HPPower162 HP
291 NmTorque251 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
63 ltFuel tank59 lt
—Urban consumption15 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9 lt
11,6 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears4
225/60 R16 HTyre size185/75 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5102 mmLength4835 mm
1826 mmWidth1765 mm
1402 mmHeight1375 mm
1512 KgWeight1275 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2665 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Chevrolet Lumina and 1996 Oldsmobile Cutlass approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Oldsmobile Cutlass leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…