1999 • Chevrolet
Lanos
Chevrolet Lanos 1.5 i (86 Hp) 1999Overall Score46.25/100
1999 Chevrolet Lanos vs 2000 Mazda 323 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Mazda
323
Mazda 323 1.5 i 16V (88 Hp) 2000Overall Score47.25/100
WINNER
Mazda 323
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Chevrolet LanosSpecificationMazda 323
ChevroletMakeMazda
LanosModel323
1999Model year2000
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Chevrolet LanosSpecificationMazda 323
12,5 s0–100 km/h11,9 s
172 km/hTop speed177 km/h
1498 ccEngine displacement1498 cc
86 HPPower88 HP
130 NmTorque132 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Chevrolet LanosSpecificationMazda 323
PetrolFuel typePetrol
48 ltFuel tank55 lt
10,4 ltUrban consumption9,5 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,3 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Chevrolet LanosSpecificationMazda 323
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R14Tyre size185/65 R14
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Chevrolet LanosSpecificationMazda 323
4237 mmLength4200 mm
1678 mmWidth1705 mm
1432 mmHeight1410 mm
—Weight1115 Kg
2520 mmWheelbase2610 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1999 Chevrolet Lanos and 2000 Mazda 323 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda 323 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS-2000-Teknik-Ozellikleri.jpg)
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…