DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1997 Chevrolet Lanos vs 1997 Mitsubishi Space Runner Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Lanos

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

46.25–45.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeMitsubishi
LanosModelSpace Runner
1997Model year1997
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

12,5 s0–100 km/h17,8 s
172 km/hTop speed155 km/h
1498 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
86 HPPower82 HP
130 NmTorque172 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
48 ltFuel tank55 lt
10,4 ltUrban consumption8,0 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,5 lt
—Average consumption7,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R14Tyre size185/70 R14
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4237 mmLength4270 mm
1678 mmWidth1695 mm
1432 mmHeight1665 mm
—Weight1260 Kg
2520 mmWheelbase2520 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1997 Chevrolet Lanos and 1997 Mitsubishi Space Runner approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Lanos leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…