DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Chevrolet Impala vs 2003 Ford Explorer Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Explorer

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

70.75–71.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeFord
ImpalaModelExplorer
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors3

Performance

8,5 s0–100 km/h—
200 km/hTop speed177 km/h
3791 ccEngine displacement3958 cc
203 HPPower160 HP
305 NmTorque305 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank66 lt
11,8 ltUrban consumption—
7,8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,1 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears5
225/60 R16Tyre size255/70 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5080 mmLength4536 mm
1855 mmWidth1783 mm
1455 mmHeight1714 mm
1560 KgWeight1807 Kg
2805 mmWheelbase2593 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Chevrolet Impala and 2003 Ford Explorer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Explorer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…