DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Chevrolet Impala vs 2015 Mazda CX-9 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Impala

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

78.75–78.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeMazda
ImpalaModelCX-9
2013Model year2015
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats7
4Doors5

Performance

0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3556 ccEngine displacement3726 cc
305 HPPower273 HP
358 NmTorque270 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank76 lt
12,3 ltUrban consumption13,8 lt
8,1 ltExtra-urban consumption9,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
235/50 R18; 245/45 R19; 245/40 R20Tyre size245/60 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5113 mmLength5232 mm
1854 mmWidth1935 mm
1496 mmHeight1727 mm
1717 KgWeight1958 Kg
2837 mmWheelbase2875 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Chevrolet Impala and 2015 Mazda CX-9 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Impala leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…