DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Chevrolet Cruze vs 2009 Volvo V50 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Cruze

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeVolvo
CruzeModelV50
2009Model year2009
HatchbackBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

10,4 s0–100 km/h9,6 s
195 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement1999 cc
141 HPPower145 HP
176 NmTorque185 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank55 lt
10,7 ltUrban consumption10,2 lt
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption5,7 lt
7,4 ltAverage consumption7,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
205/60 R16Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4510 mmLength4522 mm
1789 mmWidth1845 mm
1477 mmHeight1457 mm
1319 KgWeight1381 Kg
2685 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Chevrolet Cruze and 2009 Volvo V50 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Cruze leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…