DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Chevrolet Cruze vs 2010 Volvo C30 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Cruze

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeVolvo
CruzeModelC30
2010Model year2010
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats5
4Doors3

Performance

12,5 s0–100 km/h11,3 s
185 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1560 cc
113 HPPower114 HP
153 NmTorque270 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank52 lt
9,0 ltUrban consumption5,2 lt
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption3,8 lt
6,8 ltAverage consumption4,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
205/60 R16Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4597 mmLength4266 mm
1788 mmWidth1782 mm
1477 mmHeight1447 mm
1360 KgWeight1331 Kg
2685 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Chevrolet Cruze and 2010 Volvo C30 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Cruze leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…