DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Chevrolet Corsa vs 2002 Kia Retona Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Retona

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

43.25–43.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeKia
CorsaModelRetona
2002Model year2002
EstateBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

18,5 s0–100 km/h20,5 s
150 km/hTop speed120 km/h
1686 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
60 HPPower87 HP
112 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
46 ltFuel tank60 lt
6,1 ltUrban consumption11,5 lt
4,9 ltExtra-urban consumption9,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
185/60 R14Tyre size215/75 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4025 mmLength4000 mm
1610 mmWidth1745 mm
1470 mmHeight1835 mm
1070 KgWeight1505 Kg
2445 mmWheelbase2360 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Chevrolet Corsa and 2002 Kia Retona approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Retona leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…