DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Chevrolet Cobalt vs 2010 Great Wall Cowry Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Great Wall Cowry

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.5–66.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeGreat Wall
CobaltModelCowry
2010Model year2010
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats8
4Doors4

Performance

0 km/hTop speed170 km/h
2198 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
141 HPPower143 HP
203 NmTorque185 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
49 ltFuel tank0 lt
9,5 ltUrban consumption—
6,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
8,0 ltAverage consumption9,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/60 R15Tyre size195/65 R15; 205/55 R16
YesABS—

Dimensions

4584 mmLength4574 mm
1725 mmWidth1704 mm
1450 mmHeight1845 mm
1301 KgWeight1510 Kg
2624 mmWheelbase2825 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Chevrolet Cobalt and 2010 Great Wall Cowry approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Great Wall Cowry leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…